The center, converging with the right.
A Democratic legislator and a far-right activist ran parallel campaigns against the same event for his own party’s left. His party’s progressives called it what it looked like.
In August 2026, a DSA-aligned rally in South Florida headlined by Rep. Rashida Tlaib was dropped by its venue after public pressure from two very different directions at once: Democratic state Rep. Michael Gottlieb and far-right activist Laura Loomer. This page documents that convergence and the intra-party condemnation it drew — and is careful about what it does not claim. We do not rule on whether the event was antisemitic; that is genuinely contested. We report who did what, and who said what about it.
What this page is about
“Chomp the Oligarchy” was a voter rally by Gen-Z for Change and the Florida Youth Justice Coalition, headlined by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, backing progressive Florida candidates — part of an effort that included primary challenges to Jewish Democratic incumbents. Ahead of it, Democratic state Rep. Michael Gottlieb denounced the event on Facebook as an “Anti-Israel and Anti-Zionism coalition,” and far-right activist Laura Loomer ran a parallel campaign on X. The Jewish-owned venue then backed out of a paid booking; organizers relocated and the event went ahead.
The reason this belongs on a “sowing division” ledger is narrow and documented: a sitting Democrat’s public pressure converged with a far-right activist’s to shut down an event for his own party’s left, and his own party’s progressive wing condemned him for it. The axis they converged on was Israel. We name that plainly, and we decline to referee the underlying antisemitism dispute.
Books that go deeper on this story. Links are Amazon affiliate searches — buying through them supports the work at no cost to you.
What happened, claim by claim
A Democratic legislator and a far-right activist ran parallel pressure campaigns against the same rally — and the venue dropped it.
FACTState Rep. Michael Gottlieb (D-Broward) denounced the rally on Facebook as an 'Anti-Israel and Anti-Zionism coalition of candidates,' and far-right activist Laura Loomer ran a parallel campaign on X. The Venue Fort Lauderdale, which is Jewish-owned and operated, then backed out of a paid booking, which organizers called a breach of contract. The event was relocated and proceeded. That both a sitting Democrat and Loomer publicly pressured the same event, and that the venue then dropped it, is documented across mainstream reporting.
The event was a DSA-aligned rally for candidates challenging Jewish Democratic incumbents, headlined by Tlaib.
FACT'Chomp the Oligarchy' was organized by Gen-Z for Change and the Florida Youth Justice Coalition, headlined by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and boosted candidates including Democratic socialist Oliver Larkin — part of an effort that included primary challenges to Jewish Democratic incumbents Jared Moskowitz and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This context matters and cuts both ways: it is why supporters call it ordinary intra-party politics, and why critics call it targeting.
His own party's progressives condemned Gottlieb for aligning with the far right against the left.
SOME SMOKECandidate Elijah Manley publicly accused Gottlieb of 'teaming up with Loomer' to attack the event, and the Florida Democratic Progressive Caucus issued a statement condemning him. That his fellow Democrats made this charge, in these terms, is a fact. The charge itself — that a Democratic officeholder aligned with a far-right activist to silence his party's left — is their characterization, which we carry as theirs. It is graded SOME SMOKE: well-grounded in the documented convergence, but a claim about alignment and intent that we attribute rather than assert.
- Elijah Manley (candidate), via Miami New Times
- Florida Democratic Progressive Caucus statement (surfaced by Ryan Grim)
The parts we refuse to referee, and the balance the record demands
- We do not rule on the antisemitism question. Whether the event, its candidates, or Rep. Tlaib crossed from anti-Zionism into antisemitism is exactly the contested judgment at the center of the dispute. The U.S. House censured Tlaib in 2023 over “antisemitic statements and anti-Israel remarks” — so Gottlieb’s objection is a view held well beyond the fringe. The organizers reject the characterization. We report that both positions exist; we do not adjudicate between them.
- And the question cuts the other way. It is fair to ask a pointed question in the opposite direction, and critics — including Jewish progressives — do: when a legislator recasts an anti-oligarchy rally as “anti-Jew,” is he answering an antisemitic stereotype or reaching for one? The equation “anti-oligarchy = anti-Jew” only computes if you accept the oldest trope of all — that Jews and oligarchic money-power are the same thing. Speaking for all Jews as a bloc opposed to Tlaib erases the Jewish organizers and anti-Zionists in the very coalition he was describing. And no one brands every challenger to a Jewish incumbent an antisemite; the label attached here because Tlaib, a Palestinian, was on the bill. We pose that question, plainly, because the piece should not dodge it — and, consistent with everything above, we leave the answer to the reader rather than declare a named legislator a bigot in our own voice.
- This is a private venue, not the state. The Venue is Jewish-owned and said it canceled over “the full scope and nature of the event,” security concerns, and its “values and commitment to the Jewish community.” A business declining to host is exercising its own association rights. That makes this categorically different from the state surveillance and subpoenas documented elsewhere on this site — and we keep the distinction.
- What is left is still worth documenting. Strip away the parts we won’t referee, and a plain fact remains: a sitting Democrat’s public campaign converged with a far-right activist’s against an event for his own party’s left, and his party’s progressives condemned him for it. That convergence, on an Israel litmus test, is the documented core.
The establishment moves against its own left flank
This is a small, local instance of a pattern this site tracks at scale: the party establishment turning on its own left, and, in doing so, finding itself on the same side as the right. Nationally, Third Way’s “Anti-Extremism” project is the well-funded version of the same war on the Democratic Socialists. Here it is a state legislator and a MAGA influencer, briefly pointed at the same target. The axis is different — this convergence runs on Israel, not on the economic centrism that funds Third Way — and we name that honestly rather than flatten the two together. What unites them is the direction of travel: pressure aimed inward, at the left, from the center.
Questions worth taking seriously
Are you saying the rally was, or wasn't, antisemitic?
Neither. That is the contested judgment at the heart of the dispute, and we decline to referee it. We note that the House censured Tlaib in 2023, that Gottlieb (who is Jewish) raised the objection in good-faith protected speech, and that the organizers reject the characterization. We report the convergence and the intra-party condemnation, not a verdict on antisemitism.
Isn't a venue allowed to cancel an event it doesn't want to host?
Yes, and we say so plainly. The Venue is Jewish-owned and cited its own values and security concerns; a private business declining to host is exercising its association rights, not state power. That is why this page is careful to call it intra-party politics, not the state suppression documented elsewhere on the site.
If you are named on this page
If you are named on this page, or are a party materially affected by the claims made here, and you wish to respond, correct the record, or add context, use the Contact page. Responses are published verbatim alongside the original claim, with the sender identified and the date of receipt. The channel stays open for the life of the page.
This site aggregates and grades a record that other outlets and primary sources have already put on the record. Every FACT-graded claim above is sourced to court filings, government reports, sworn whistleblower disclosures, published investigative journalism, or named-source statements. The citations are the accountability mechanism; this section is how you get on the record too.